New Legal Drug Bates Teens
ByMove over Marijuana, a new drug has just hit the market. It packs all the punch of pot, and then some. It doesn’t show up on drug tests and is readily available for purchase. It can be bought through the internet, or right over the counter at your local smoke shop. Worst of all, it’s legal and being marketed towards teens. As increasing publicity hits the mass media and social networking sites, this drug seems destined to make a big splash amongst the teen party crowd. Unfortunately, it’s impact is already being felt in hospital emergency rooms.
Called “K2″, the new substance is sold as herbal incense. But at $30 a pack – approximately the same cost as illegal marijuana – customers buy it expecting much more that a pleasant aroma. And the product doesn’t disappoint. It’s the latest in a string of highly potent products that include a recently discovered synthetic form of cannabinoids. They started appearing in the U.S. a little less than a year ago, and have been sold under several different names (Spice, Summit, Red Dragon Smoke, Fake Weed, Supernova, Genie etc.). K2 alone, has been linked to at least thirty hospitalizations in the St. Louis area in just the past couple of months.
The synthetic Cannabinoids of K2 produce effects which are significantly more powerful than those produced by the naturally occurring Cannabinoids found in street level Marijuana. One of the active ingredients, HU-210, is between 100 – 800 times more potent than THC, and chemists have found the smoked drug to be ten times more powerful than pot. The side effects are more powerful as well, with some users experiencing severe heart palpitations, dangerous hallucinations, dangerously elevated blood pressure, vomiting and panic attacks. The drug is too new for experts to gauge how powerful the addictive properties of K2 will be, and no information is yet available evaluate the mid to long-range health effects.
Though the U.S. Customs Service banned a predecessor of K2 from being imported into the United States, a string of imitation products quickly developed to fill the void. Several states, and the federal government, have been left scrambling to develop legislation and enforcement initiatives in response to the new threat. In the meantime, we are left with a very dangerous product on the market. One which is legal to possess and use, is easily purchased, and growing in popularity amongst teens.
Why is it legal? Because it’s sold as either plant food, or incense. There’s been no testing done on humans. Unfortunately, as with the huffing of household chemicals, there’s no shortage of people who are willing to give it a try. Internet blogs are full of users bragging about the use of the drug; many offering instructions on how to use the product. The catch phrases, “legal” and “undetectable” beckon to many teens. Smoke shops can’t keep it on their shelves.
Detection
Parents should look for dilated pupils, distorted perceptions, trouble estimating elapsed time, hallucinations, and a spacey attitude. Effects last approximately thirty minutes.
The drug itself looks much like marijuana, and most commonly resembles green vegetation. The synthetic compound can be sprayed over any substance, so the product in the package can actually come in many forms.
Parents should be on the lookout for smoking paraphernalia. K2 is used in the same way as marijuana. It is rolled into joints or smoked in bongs. For pictures of this paraphernalia, visit our Marijuana Tutorial.
loading...























4 Comments
June 9th, 2010 at 1:54 pm
Well if they would legalize/industrialize marijuana they wouldn’t have teens trying to smoke chemicals and at the same time turn the economy around…
loading...
June 9th, 2010 at 4:59 pm
Thanks for the comment James! Makes you wonder though. If we legalize marijuana, encourage an increase in its use, are our health care costs likely to go up or down? Are there likely to be more fatal accidents or less? Are those teens likely to be more successful in life, or less?
Economically speaking, I think we can draw many parallels to alcohol and tobacco here. These are industrialized and taxed products, but who has profited from their use and who has paid the price? Unfortunately, the good guys always seem to lose here. No?
loading...
August 17th, 2010 at 9:39 am
I agree with James. If you look at the $$ spent on law enforcement alone we would save money. Funny how once a thing becomes legal it’s allure decreases. It was so with my son-turned 21-could care less about drinking now. Some use pot as a substitute to pharmaceuticals (even grown-ups). People who REALLY want to smoke will. Just keep it off the streets, and away from teens.
loading...
August 18th, 2010 at 8:18 am
This is such a great topic, and one that deserves an open minded approach. I have a lot of respect for the Libertarian stance on drug law reform. I embrace the fact that the argument is tied to an endorsement of personal freedom, rather than an endorsement of recreational drug use. I am also in full agreement as to the debilitating fiscal consequences of our drug enforcement efforts as well as the inadequacy of treatment programs for incarcerated drug users. Still I have great reservations about the likely effects of decriminalization.
Contrary to popular instinct, studies have failed to demonstrate any legislative induced enticement to drug use. The fact is, teens are prone to rebellion and risk taking, a circumstance that will persist with or without drug laws. It’s very unlikely that the removal of criminal consequence would reduce experimentation rates or dissuade kids from rebelling via drug use. Consider also, that in a great many examples, legislation has proven to have a strong deterrent effect. Though I do acknowledge the intrusion, the regulation and enforcement of the minimum drinking age, the use of seat belts and the wearing of helmets by cyclists have shown remarkable success in saving lives and reducing social costs.
Both property crimes and hate crimes are disproportionately associated with youthful offenders, but I don’t think many would argue for the decriminalization of these acts, nor suggest that the laws contribute to the problem.
Setting aside the blatant advocacy crowd, both the Libertarians and the intellectually honest Pro-Drug Groups acknowledge that the decriminalization of drug laws will result in a net increase of drug users. The assertion is that the popular drug use patterns will evolve to be less harmful than they are now, perhaps giving us an opportunity to better treat the problem when it becomes medically necessary. I have trouble getting past the simple equation of More Drug Users = More Problems.
Prescription drug abuse increased by over 400% in the last decade alone. In California, medical marijuana cards can be obtained for the treatment of ailments which grossly extrapolate the claimed benefits of Cannabis based medicine. Both of these demonstrate the present inadequacies of mere “regulation”. And Can you imagine what a powerful company like Budweiser or Marlboro could do with a product like marijuana if it were to ever be commercialized?
Mine is just an opinion, and I am equally respectful of yours. I appreciate the dialogue and hope that it will someday lead to a better solution than we have now.
loading...